Program counts
How Many RN to BSN Programs Are There?
The Number Is 362, and Almost Nobody Publishes It
Ask how many RN to BSN programs exist and the answer you will be handed is some version of 1,112. That figure is real, it is federal, and it is the wrong one. It counts every bachelor's degree in nursing filed under CIP 51.3801 at award level five, which puts the traditional four-year pre-licensure BSN and the completion track for already-licensed nurses in a single bucket with no field separating them.
A nurse holding an ADN and a license cannot enroll in a pre-licensure program. So a list built straight off that code is, for this reader, mostly a list of things that are not available to them — and it is exactly what a search for the best BSN programs returns, which is why those lists are topped by campus degrees that will not admit a working RN into a completion track at all.
Our count is 362. Every one of them was checked against the text of the school's own program page, then checked again for whether it is still admitting, and the determination is kept with the sentence it rests on, so it can be argued with rather than taken on faith. 290 of the 362 carry enough in the federal file to be scored. That is the number a nurse can actually shop from, and it is 26.1% of where we started.
Where 1,112 Becomes 290
Three steps, each one a decision we can show you rather than a filter applied quietly.
| Step | Programs | Share of 1,112 | What the step is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bachelor's programs IPEDS files under CIP 51.3801 | 1,112 | 100.0% | The federal universe. Completion tracks and pre-licensure BSN degrees share one code. |
| Track and institution identified | 400 | 36.0% | A resolved track/campus determination, before excluding closures and admissions pauses. |
| Still open to a licensed RN | 362 | 32.6% | Checked against the school's own RN-to-BSN page. 38 were closed to new students or were not offered at that institution and came off. |
| Clear the scoring gate and are ranked | 290 | 26.1% | In-state tuition, an institutional graduation rate, and at least 10 degrees a year. |
The first step is the one that does the work, and it is worth being precise about what happens to the 712 programs that do not come through it. 106 have unresolved track wording or campus identity. A general reference to registered nurses does not establish a completion track, and an online division's program cannot establish a separate campus's eligibility. The remaining 606 were not placed by the check at all. A share of those are the traditional pre-licensure degrees the code also holds.
The second step exists because a page naming a completion track is not the same as a program that will admit you. Our first pass often read a school's general nursing page, which can list an RN-to-BSN next to the traditional degree long after the track has stopped taking students. Checking each program's own RN-to-BSN page took 38 off: some closed, in the school's own words, and some turned out to be campuses of a university that runs its completion track only online, and some had quietly dropped it from the current catalog. The methodology lists every one.
None of that is a verdict on a program. Being outside our map means our evidence did not reach it, and a nurse whose local school is missing here should read that as our limit rather than the school's. The check is repeatable: open the program page, and see whether the school itself uses the words RN to BSN, RN-BSN, BSN completion or post-licensure about a degree you could enter with a license in hand.
The 72 Confirmed Programs We Will Not Score
The second step is narrower and easier to describe. A program is ranked only when the federal file carries all three inputs the score depends on: in-state tuition, an institutional graduation rate, and at least 10 degrees conferred a year in this code. 72 confirmed programs are missing one of those.
- 39 — confers fewer than 10 degrees a year, too few to compare.
- 23 — ipeds carries no graduation rate for this institution.
- 10 — ipeds carries no tuition figure for this institution.
The tempting move with a program the file describes thinly is to score it low, and it is the wrong move. A low score says we compared this program and it came out behind. What actually happened is that we could not compare it. So these 72 appear on their state page below the ranking, named, with the reason attached, and they are excluded from every scored list on the site. Our methodology page sets out why partial data produces a number but not a comparable one.
Where the 290 Ranked Programs Are
47 of the 50 states hold at least one confirmed program, plus 2 jurisdictions outside them, and 45 of those states hold at least one that clears the scoring gate. The distribution across them is not even.
| By supply | State | Ranked programs | Share of 290 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Florida | 32 | 11.0% |
| 2nd | Texas | 22 | 7.6% |
| 3rd | Ohio | 14 | 4.8% |
| 4th | Pennsylvania | 14 | 4.8% |
| 5th | Missouri | 13 | 4.5% |
Those five states hold 95 of the 290 ranked programs between them — 32.8% of the national list in five of the 47 places that have one. Florida alone carries 32, 11.0% of the national list, which is why its state page reads nothing like the others.
At the other end, 6 states and jurisdictions carry a single ranked program apiece. There is no useful ranking to publish for one program, and there is no honest way to make a top-ten list out of it, so those appear in the national directory instead. That is the reasoning behind the threshold.
The threshold is 5 ranked programs. Reach it and the state gets a page of its own; 24 of the 47 do, and 23 do not. Measured on confirmed programs instead of scored ones the bar is cleared by 31, and the difference between those two counts is the 7 states where enough completion tracks exist but the federal file does not carry a scoreable record for enough of them: Alabama, Arizona, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, South Carolina, West Virginia. A nurse in any of those states has more options than our ranked list can show, and the directory is the place to see them.
Who Runs These Programs
Counted across all 362 confirmed programs, scored and unscored together.
| Control | Confirmed | Share | Ranked | Outside the score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public | 205 | 56.6% | 180 | 25 |
| Private nonprofit | 128 | 35.4% | 98 | 30 |
| Private for-profit | 29 | 8.0% | 12 | 17 |
Public institutions run 205 of the 362, which is 56.6% and more than the other two groups combined. That shape is worth carrying into any search: the completion track is largely a state-university product, and the marketing volume a nurse encounters online is not distributed the same way the programs are.
The last column is the one that repays a second look. It is not evenly spread. 12.2% of public programs sit outside the scored list, against 58.6% of private for-profit ones. The reasons differ by group as well: among public and private nonprofit programs the most common one is the award threshold, while among for-profit programs it is more often that IPEDS carries no tuition or graduation-rate figure for the institution.
Read that as a fact about the federal record and not about the schools. What it means in practice is that any ranking of this field — ours included — is scored on a cohort whose composition is a little different from the field's, and a reader comparing two programs across that line should confirm the price with the school rather than assume the list is complete.
Three Questions That Sort a Real Count from a Republished One
You will find other numbers for this field, and they will disagree with ours and with each other. Most of the disagreement is not error; it is different questions being answered under the same heading. These three ask what a list actually did.
- Does it say which award level it counted? CIP 51.3801 runs from certificates through the doctorate. Ours is bachelor's only, award level five. A count that does not say is not comparable to one that does.
- Does it separate completion tracks from pre-licensure degrees? This is the one that decides whether a list is usable by a licensed nurse, and it cannot be done from the federal file — it takes reading the programs. If a list does not mention the distinction, it did not make it, and its number will be close to 1,112.
- Does it distinguish a program it scored from one it could not score? Ranking a program on whichever inputs happen to be present, then presenting the result next to a fully scored one, produces a list where a small institution with one strong figure outranks a large one with three ordinary ones.
A list that answers all three will land somewhere near ours, and where it differs you will be able to see why. That is the whole point of publishing the smaller number: it is arguable. The ranked list holds the 290 scored programs across 24 state pages, the directory holds every confirmed program including the 72 that are unscored, and the methodology sets out each decision above in the form it was actually made.
Questions About How These Programs Are Counted
How many RN to BSN programs are there in the United States?
Why is your number smaller than the 1,112 in the federal data?
Which states have the most RN to BSN programs?
Does a program missing from your list mean it is not accredited or not real?
How many RN to BSN programs are online?
Keep Reading
Methodology
How completion tracks are separated from pre-licensure degrees, and the factors we deliberately do not score.
Rankings
The 290 scored programs, across 24 state pages, on cost and graduation rate.
Directory
Every one of the 362 confirmed programs, Florida's 32 included, with the school's own page linked.